Big pharma, media, and CDC, now making massive push to forcefully vaccinate everyone
By Shepard Ambellas
(INTELLIHUB) — I couldn’t believe my eyes when I saw the headline flash onto the screen this morning. I was shocked. Never before have I felt so much disgust toward the establishment controlled media. I was infuriated at what I was seeing right in front of my very own eyes.
The headline read: “The money behind the anti-vax movement”.
This headline, which was featured on CNN during host Carol Costello’s time slot, is absolute insanity as dangerous vaccines are now literally pushed onto the populace by big pharma and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in a full-on propaganda campaign, war, directed against the general public’s free will and right to medical autonomy.
In fact the headline should rather have read quite the opposite. Something to the effect of: “The money behind big pharma’s push to vaccinate the general public”. But it didn’t because we live in a world in which up is down and left is right as nothing is what it seems anymore.
Additionally banners were scrolling across the screen on Costello’s show reading: “CA lawmakers seek to end vaccine exemptions”. It was literally like seeing something off of a futuristic Arnold Schwarzenegger flick, but it’s actually the world in which we now live. We literally live in The Running Man.
Costello further shilled-out for the establishment as part of her paid job raising a question to a so-called doctor. “Isn’t the only way to counter this [the anti-vaxxer] movement to make it illegal not to vaccinate you children?”, Costillo asked.
Needless to say this was the point where I nearly almost fell out of my chair. I was enraged.
Essentially this bought and paid for shill, Carol Costello, was suggesting, rather insinuating, that vaccinations be mandated by the government controlled medical establishment and forced onto the populace against our will”.
Boy oh boy, I would love to see the medical industry inject this woman with a plethora of the very same vaccines she is pushing, a nice toxic cocktail dose of thiomersal, mercury, and other poisonous agents which are present in most flu, and other, vaccines as admitted by the CDC themselves.
To boot thiomersal is far worse than the CDC is admitting. In fact Dawn Prate reporting for Natural News points out the truth about thimerasol describing how it’s a “preservative of choice for vaccine manufacturers.”
First introduced by Eli Lilly and Company in the late 1920s and early 1930s, the company began selling it as a preservative in vaccines in the 1940s. Thimerosal contains 49.6 percent mercury by weight and is metabolized or degraded into ethylmercury and thiosalicylate. Mercury, or more precisely, ethylmercury, is the principle agent that kills contaminants. Unfortunately, mercury also kills much more than that.
The Department of Defense classifies mercury as a hazardous material that could cause death if swallowed, inhaled or absorbed through the skin. Studies indicate that mercury tends to accumulate in the brains of primates and other animals after they are injected with vaccines. Mercury poisoning has been linked to cardiovascular disease, autism, seizures, mental retardation, hyperactivity, dyslexia and many other nervous system conditions. That’s why the FDA rigorously limits exposure to mercury in foods and drugs. Some common sources of mercury include dental amalgam fillings, various vaccines and certain fish contaminated by polluted ocean waters.
The toxicity of mercury has never been in question. The real question is precisely how much mercury-laced thimerosal is toxic, and what are the possible consequences for our children at low doses?
Eli Lilly and Co. supposedly answered this question for us back in 1930. Concluding thimerosal to be of “a very low order of toxicity . . . for man,” the company hired its own doctors to perform thimerosal experiments in Indianapolis City Hospital on meningitis patients during a severe outbreak in 1929. This 60-year-old evidence was still quoted on the company’s brochures as recently as 1990. Andrew Waters, who is involved in a lawsuit against Eli Lilly, claims that most critical studies on the toxicity of thimerosal were suppressed by the company until now., reported Dawn Prate.
Prate continued on pointing out how Thiomersal is “banned around the world, but not in the United States”, writing:
That might explain why thimerosal was eliminated in many countries 20 years ago. In 1977, a Russian study found that adults exposed to ethylmercury, the form of mercury in thimerosal, suffered brain damage years later. Studies on thimerosal poisoning also describe tubular necrosis and nervous system injury, including obtundation, coma and death. As a result of these findings, Russia banned thimerosal from children’s vaccines in 1980. Denmark, Austria, Japan, Great Britain and all the Scandinavian countries have also banned the preservative.Eli Lilly stuck to its “scientific” facts, but the truth began slipping between the cracks in 1999. After the number of immunizations rose to 12 to 15 per child, the public finally became privy to the possible dangers of thimerosal. One 1999 study revealed that some infants, due to a genetic or developmental factor, lack the ability to eliminate mercury. Trace amounts of mercury in these infants, when accumulated over several vaccines, could pose a severe health risk. Some vaccines, such as vaccines for hepatitis B, contained as much as 12.5 micrograms of mercury per dose. That’s more than 100 times the EPA’s upper limit standard when administered to infants.
Hepatitis B vaccines aren’t the only immunizations under suspicion. According to Burton Goldberg in Alternative Medicine, scientists are finding stronger and stronger links between thimerosal and neurological damage. One report by Dr. Vijendra Singh of the Department of Pharmacology at the University of Michigan found a higher incidence of measles, mumps and rubella vaccine (MMR) antibodies in autistic children.
The National Vaccine Information Center in Vienna, Virginia, has noted a strong association between the MMR vaccine and autistic features. Reporting similar findings, the Encephalitis Support Group in England claims that children who became autistic after the MMR vaccine started showing autistic symptoms as early as 30 days after vaccination. The diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus vaccine (DPT) given at two, four and six months has triggered autistic symptoms, as well.
When the FDA finally formally released this information in 1999, the news came too little too late for some parents. The damage had already been done.
Prate’s research even shows “links between autism and thiomersal”. Prate wrote:
Autism affects 500,000 to 1.5 million Americans and has grown at an annual rate of 10 to 17 percent since the late 1980s. California found a 273 percent increase in autism between 1987 and 1998. Maryland reported a 513 percent increase in autism between 1993 and 1998 and several dozen other states reported similar findings. Some scientists say the estimated number of cases of autism has increased 15-fold –1,500 percent – since 1991, when the number of childhood vaccinations doubled. Whereas one in every 2,500 children was diagnosed with autism before 1991, one in 166 children now have the disease.This increase in reported autism cases eerily parallels the increase in the number and frequency of thimerosal-containing vaccinations administered to infants. As of today, children are given as many as 21 immunizations in the first 15 months of life. After a number of scientists and concerned activists noticed the correlation, an investigation was launched to get to the heart of the matter.
Moreover Prate points out the “statistical evidence links thimerosal with nervous system disorders” as follows:
In June 2000, federal officials and industry representatives were assembled by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to discuss the disturbing evidence. According to Tom Verstraeten, an epidemiologist who had analyzed the data on the CDC’s database, thimerosal appeared to be responsible for a dramatic increase in autism and other neurological disorders. Verstraeten told those at the meeting that a number of earlier studies indicate a link between thimerosal and speech delays, attention-deficit disorder, hyperactivity and autism.Verstraeten offered no possible cause for this correlation, but held that the statistical evidence linking vaccines and neurological disorders was strong. Dr. Bill Weil, a consultant for the American Academy of Pediatrics, and Dr. Richard Johnston, an immunologist and pediatrician from the University of Colorado, presented similar concerns to the group. However, given no causal relationship, the CDC and industry representatives were quick to discredit the evidence.
Consequently, the CDC paid the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to conduct another study on thimerosal. According to Robert F. Kennedy Jr., this study was fixed in order to “whitewash” previous findings. In its 2001 report, the IOM’s Immunization Safety Review Committee did conclude that the link between thimerosal and neurodevelopmental disorders was biologically plausible, though the evidence neither proved nor negated it. The Committee stated that phasing out thimerosal from vaccines was “a prudent measure in support of the public health goal to reduce mercury exposure of infants and children as much as possible.” However, these findings offered no imperative. The data presented at the 2000 meeting was withheld from publication and the link between thimerosal and autism remained “inconclusive.”
But what does “inconclusive” mean? Well, that depends on who you talk to. According to the FDA, these “inconclusive” findings negate the risk of a causal relationship between thimerosal and autism. Even Tom Verstraeten, one of the presenters of epidemiological evidence at the CDC meeting, seemingly changed his tune a bit. In 2000, Verstraeten vigorously campaigned against thimerosal based upon his “inconclusive” correlation, but after he was hired by GlaxoSmithKline, the doctor changed his position. The same evidence from 2000, in Verstraeten’s eyes, became “neutral” in 2003. After criticism for this apparent flip-flop, Verstaeten wrote a letter to the editor of Pediatrics in 2004 backing the CDC’s actions and his own research methods.
But despite all of the evidence that the quote “anti-vaxxer movement” has and solid information like Prate’s, the push to counter the truth with lies continues.
Most recently we see the truth being countered by Sam Becker, reporting for Wall St. Cheat Sheet. On Feb. 4, the corporate shill, Becker, wrote in a piece titled “Following the money behind the anti-vaccine movement”:
“In the United States, we are witnessing the scientifically ignorant and sometimes deadly impact of an anti-vaccine movement,” writes Dr. Robert Pearl, a contributor for Forbes. “Individuals who support the movement continue to question the safety and necessity of vaccines despite extensive medical literature to the contrary.”
And so we come to the latest trend in junk science: The shunning of vaccinations for children by misguided parents. While vaccines have been commonplace for decades now, this new movement among parents to opt their children out of the vaccination progress is starting to lead to some very real consequences, like a measles outbreak at Disneyland. Other children are at risk as well, and one father has even stepped in to ask his son’s school to ban unvaccinated children from attending.
So, why is this happening now? Surely, most of these parents who are deciding not to vaccinate their children have their kids’ best interests in mind. But why, even in the face of all the evidence to the contrary, do they decide to put their children — and everyone else’s — in danger? As with almost anything else, there has to be some kind of motivation for the anti-vaccine movement to perpetuate itself. And, like almost anything else, it’s probably money.
We can also see how this dovetails into the CDC’s new agenda, as they are now harassing the general populace with phone calls, trying to dig up as much personal information about you and your family as they can. I myself recently received one of these calls as I reported in my Jan. 20 article titled The CDC called me yesterday; what they wanted to know may shock you. In the article I wrote:
At 9:52 p.m. CST I received a call from the Center for Disease Control (CDC). It was a recorded message, a survey. They wanted to know how many people, including children resided in my household and how many of them were vaccinated.
I was dumbfounded by the call, caught off guard, as I was already sound asleep after a long day at work.
Although no children reside in my household, the call was terribly shocking to me as it has already been reported that parents of schoolchildren have been threatened with arrest for refusing vaccinations.
So this morning I decided to call the number back and see who was on the other end. A woman answered who was trying to gain more personal information from me to see if I was “eligible”.
I then explained to the woman who I was sleeping when I missed the call and asked if she could email me information on the survey.
The email which I received from the CDC Nation Immunization Survey reads as follows:
Thank you for your interest in the National Immunization Survey (NIS). As you requested, a letter that describes the purpose of this study and why we are calling your household can be found here: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nis/NIS_advance_letter.pdf
In summary, the NIS is used to call households across our nation screening for immunization data and other health care information regarding children. These data are used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to:
- Estimate accurate early childhood immunization coverage levels in every state and across the nation;
- Assist states in developing immunization intervention programs for pre-school age children to eliminate preventable childhood diseases; and
- Help local, state, and federal health authorities understand how to improve health care services for all children.
If you are interested in additional information, you can visit www.cdc.gov/nis.
If you have additional questions or concerns, please call us toll free at 877-267-8154.
We appreciate your interest and will contact you shortly to participate in this important survey.
NORC at the University of Chicago
Chicago, IL 60602
The letter sent from the CDC/Department of Health and Human Services and transcript of the recorded call reads…
From the Director of the National Center for Health Statistics:
I am asking for your help with an important study conducted by the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) called the National Immunization Survey (NIS).
This survey tells us which vaccines people in the U.S. have received and about other important health topics.
Results from the NIS are used to help health officials in their efforts to improve health care programs. In the next few weeks, NORC at the University of Chicago will call your household to take part in this study for CDC.
For this study, we need to ask about vaccinations and about children’s health. Some households also may be asked questions about the health services their children need or use.
If you have a child between 17 and 37 months of age, it would be helpful to have your child’s immunization records handy when answering our questions.
However, you can also answer these questions without the records. Your phone number was chosen randomly by computer. It is important for us to interview every household we call to get a complete picture of your area’s immunization rates and key factors that might affect them.
The study is important,but you do not have to take part, or you can decide not to answer one or more questions.
You may call this toll-free number at 1-877-267-8154 if you would like to take part in the study now. You can also call this number to learn more about the study and what you will be asked.
For more information,turn this letter over or go to the study’s web site: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nis.htm.
Your answers to the NIS will provide information to help improve the nation’s health now and in the years ahead.
We need your help to make this study a success.
We hope you will decide to take part when we call.
Thank you for your cooperation. I am grateful for your help.
Charles J. Rothwell
Acting Director, National Center for Health Statistics Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
About the author:
Shepard Ambellas is the founder, editor-in-chief of Intellihub News and the maker of SHADE the Motion Picture. You can also find him on Twitter and Facebook. Shepard also appears on the Travel Channel series America Declassified. You can also listen to him on Coast To Coast AM with hosts, both, George Noory on “Chemtrails” and John B. Wells on the “Alternative Media Special“. Shepard Ambellas has also been featured on the Drudge Report, the largest news website in the entire world, for his provocative coverage of the Bilderberg Group.